Human life perspectives

Human life perspectives essentially fall into two categories. The first category encompasses the material reality, where the truth is derived from tangible life experiences, whether it involves seeking pleasure or sacrificing for societal contributions. Actions within this scope are focused on immediate, observable outcomes. The second category believes that present life is just one dimension within a multi-dimensional space-time continuum, suggesting the existence of spiritual realms, heavens, hells, or other worlds beyond material reality, which science has yet to confirm.

Different life perspectives lead to different behaviors. Adherents of the first perspective rely solely on current reality, attributing unknowns to randomness, and their actions are practical, grounded in the external world they can perceive. Followers of the second perspective further divide into those who forsake the present reality for spiritual perpetuity and those who view material life as part of a broader spiritual journey.

In my own life, my perspective belongs to the second category. I consider both the material and spiritual aspects of every event. When faced with difficulties that are unsatisfactory from a material viewpoint, I turn to a spiritual framework. This broader spiritual reference eliminates randomness; nothing is coincidental through a spiritual lens. An adverse event, for instance, might stem from a misjudgment, leading to negative outcomes. Spiritually, such events can be explained by karma, spiritual obstacles, invisible disturbances, or unresolved conflicts from past lives. Solutions might involve transforming karma through virtuous deeds, using mantras or Buddha names to generate protective energy, praying for troubled spirits to find peace, or seeking protection from benevolent deities.

Some situations, solvable through practical means, might inappropriately rely on spiritual solutions, which is unnecessary complexity. Conversely, unsolvable practical issues may reasonably invoke spiritual solutions, which is a comprehensive approach. However, not everyone can effectively apply spiritual solutions; it requires a connection with the spiritual world and divine protection. Thus, practical solutions should always be prioritized, complemented by spiritual methods when necessary.

This holistic approach is thorough. Relying solely on spirituality without practical solutions is unrealistic, and ignoring spiritual perspectives when practical solutions are unavailable is inadequate. The best solution avoids conflicts between the two frameworks. For example, treating a severe illness involves taking medicine and consulting doctors while also addressing spiritual aspects through rituals, prayers, and penance. The dual approach ensures neither conflicts. Conversely, treating karmic illnesses with only physical medicine or addressing common illnesses with only spiritual practices is ineffective. Spiritual practices require significant energy, often unattainable by ordinary individuals.

In conclusion, the most comprehensive solution integrates both practical and spiritual perspectives. Higher wisdom ensures more reasonable and efficient resolutions.